User:MichelleCHsfsu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Julie Chu

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Julie Chu is one of my favorite athletes. My preliminary impression was that it looks okay.

Evaluate the article
The lead section provides a clear and brief description of the article.

All contents are relevant to the article. There are some contents like coaching career are not as detailed or elaborate as others. The personal Life section is outdated, and some information is missing. Compared to another athlete's article of the same sport, some statistics are combined rather than having their subsection.

The tone of the article is from a neutral point of view. There are no biased statements.

The sources and references are working. They are current, thorough, and diverse.

The organization seems tidy. All facts are in the correct sections and subsections. The article is easy to understand.

The images and media do reflect what the article is about and is well captioned.

The article is rated as a C-class. The talk page consists of editors discussing how some links are linked to the wrong articles and some facts are wrong. Other editors talk about fixing the sources. The last comment was made seven years ago.

Overall, the article is easy to understand. There are some facts and sections that need to be updated. The numbers in career statistics should be separated into different categories. For example, put all Olympics statistics together and all NCAA statistics in another subsection. The article is complete enough for a random person who is curious about this ice hockey player and wants to learn about her statistics and background.