User:MichelleEngel8/Lough Feeagh/Katiebusch7 Peer Review

Hi Michelle,

Below are comments on your first draft. Since you uploaded your first draft after peer reviews were due I am not holding your peer reviewers responsible for reviewing your first draft. Meaning this is the only feed back you will receive before the final. Also I am going to have to take off point for it being late. Each day a point is taken off, however I will only start the count since Tuesday when we cleared up your confusion on how to publish the sandbox. With that being said it was 5 days since then meaning -5 points.

Your current word count is 648 and you have 8 refs (3 scientific articles). Make sure by the final paper you have at least 8 scientific articles cited.

As for your intro I explained in lab (which you missed) to link non-common words and proper nouns to their wikipages which you have done so thank you. Keep doing that as you write. The more links the easier for the reader to full understand your page. With that being said you do seem to veer off the topic of your lake and spend too many words on explaining a limnological term, for example just link oligotrophic rather than writing 4 sentences on the definition of Oligotrophic. The rest of your intro/general lake info is very well written. Now you need to switch gears and start writing the required 4 paragraphs on current research/limnologists working with Lough Feegah. The best way to do this is to create a new section and discuss 3-4 current studies.

-Katie

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)