User:Michellevp16/Positive psychology/Cjaneellen Peer Review

General info
Michellevp16
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Michellevp16/Positive psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Positive psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Michellevp16 did a great job proposing changes to the existing content while providing explanations for why the proposed changes should be used. The proposed changes edit the current article to be more clear and concise and also points out a need for additional information. However, the changes do not include the additional information that was mentioned about Rollo May should that person be included. The proposed changes also mentioned the lack of clarity in the lead section and that all topics mentioned in the lead section were not addressed in the article. I agree with this statement and think that the lack of topics addressed in the article that are mentioned in the lead is an opportunity for Michellevp16 to expand on this content.