User:Michellevp16/Positive psychology/Sawyerbrady44 Peer Review

fGeneral info
Michellevp16
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Michellevp16/Positive psychology:Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Positive psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has not yet been changed to reflect the content to be added to the article. The lead is concise but needs more detail to reflect the major sections of the topic. In this case, the lead is too concise and needs additional content that talks about positive psychology.

The content added would be relevant to the topic and enhance the article because it would be rewording a sentence that mentions Rollo May who is not mentioned later in the article. I also think that adding information about Rollo May would be necessary if it were to be left in.

The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps and does not address topics related to underrepresented populations or topics.

The content to be added would be up to date and benefit the article because it takes away something that doesn't belong.

The sources and references are up to date and reflect the information provided by each source. There are many different authors that contributed along with secondary sources like textbooks. There are a couple of sources that can be seen as out of date (2005) but have many additional references added on when it comes to the definition of positive psychology.

I clicked on a lot of the links to different terminology and phrases and they seemed to work and reflect the information provided by the source. The sources were written by a diverse group of authors from different textbooks and peer reviewed articles.

A lot more detail needs to be added to this article. I know that we have not had a lot of time to contribute to our sandboxes so I am the same way. The content to be added makes sense and will contribute to enhancing this article. Pictures can be used all throughout this article to make it visually appealing. There are several opportunities to make this article visually appealing. There are only a few pictures and one of them doesn't have much context surrounding why it is in the place that is is.

The content to be added is well-written and concise, but much more detail is required to make this article better. The content is well organized but some things could be rearranged to make the article more easily understandable. The talk page mentions making the article more simplistic making the topic easier to read.

I think the content to be added is a good start but additional details could be made talking about the person you are getting rid of rather than just eliminating the person from the article.