User:Michgonza123/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

TikTok V. Trump: Saturday, Sept. 23

Lead Section:

The lead introductory sentence does a great job describing the article's topic. It starts off with the definition of what TikTok V. Trump is and the reasoning behind it created. Trump ordered an executive order on august 6th, 2020 prohibiting the usage of the application in five stages. You were not able to download the App TikTok if you were in the United States Enforcement team. This did not allow anyone in the White House or any Government branch to be in use of the app entirely based on speculations of data being stolen for the use of other countries. I believe it did not share too much information as basic information you would need to know to understand what the article will be about. The details were straight to the point and easy to understand from an outsider's standpoint. The lead has a brief description of the major parts of the sections. As I stated before the first sentences go into the different topics that were discussed to have created this TikTok V. Trump lawsuit.

Content  Section:

The content section of the article is very well staying relevant to the topic of choice. This part of the article is just giving a little more information about the steps that were taken and the response it was getting from the government. This content is up to date with the relevance of when it was occurring, although there is no update about if this law is still being put into place, now that there is a new president. I believe there is information missing about what occurred with the dealer selling to the American tech company Oracle. This would be great information to include, we are felt unknown, and if they were still open to selling their app. I believe there are no equity gaps being enforced with this article. Everything seems to be fair and understandable.

Tone and Balance

The article is written in a neutral tone. It states what needs to be stated while giving a little more information. They are not picking sides nor electing what is right or wrong. The article is not presiding of one side but rather another, if anything they are informing us about what has occurred and has been done to fix or mess around with.

Sources and References

As for the sources and references, they did a pretty good job of making sure they are all reliable and true. The first one is from the New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Federal Register. There were a few questionable sources that are known to be not so great such as CNN. This might be a personal thought and from an outsider's perspective but they are not always a reliable source. There is a good chunk of references which is always a must. It has 20 sources that were used throughout the whole article to justify their words of choice. Clicking through the links and they were all able to reach their homepage.

Organization and Writing Quality

When reading the whole article, it is very clear everything that is being stated and presented to us. I thought it was easy to understand from an outsider's preservice if I did not have any understadning of what was going on. I did not spot any errors or grammatical mistakes within the article, which means they were careful and serious about their piece. Each section was broken down very well. They did it on a storyline base. This is meant by the events that had happened and the key points that we needed to hit before entering the article were perfect and not giving too much or too little.

Image and Media

Yes, the article did include one image that enhanced the topic of the article. The image is as follows, the United States of America District Court of Columbia logo. It has our famous bald eagle and the American flag. This image is making the article feel important and official, this will give the reader an open mind of relying on this article for reference. Choosing an image can make or break your article, as this is the first section that catches the reader's attention.

Talk Page Discussion

There are no conversations being held on the talk page however I believe there would be people questioning the thoughts of former Donald Trump's Decision. This article would be rated very well if there were people coming in and reading it.

Overall Impressions

I believe the article's strength is adding into account that this information is coming straight from the United States District Court House. The information we are receiving is up to date and goes off what is happening in real-time. They used many sources to back up their information and called out major people who have been a part of this process. I would like to hear China's side of their argument and how they feel and know a little bit about what they are doing to reframe this.

White article are you

TikTok V. Trump.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TikTok_v._Trump

Why have you chosen this article to evaluate?

I have chosen this article because I am a big TikTok fan like many young adults these days. I thought the argument that Trump was making was interesting and I wanted to hear him out as to why and what was being done to protect us. There is a lot of information you do not know as an outsider from the government and it is nice to always hear people out to make sure our safety and privacy are being kept under control. Although we are informed of these actions before we sign up for the app, no one really takes the time to read those couple pages of agreements we sign.