User:Michhac/sandbox

Article evaluation

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything except the 3rd paragraph, which is describing some sort of fieldwork project relate to the article topic: Peter Bellwood.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral and there is no evidence of any bias throughout the entire article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * In this very short wiki page, there is no viewpoint that is over- or underrepresented. It is very a brief and concise description of Peter Bellwood and his books, history, etc.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links to the citations do work. They clearly support the claims in the article, as they are about Peter Bellwood's education background.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * No. There are only 2 references over all, which are repeatedly referred to. The references are appropriate and come from educational and neutral sources that do not appear to contain bias.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * The information is not outdated but a lot of Peter Bellwood's personal life has been left out. There is a large focus on his educational background. One could add family history and any other relevant information relating to the subject.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is only 1 comment from 2015 stating that the page is 10 years out of date, however, based on my knowledge, at the bottom of the page it says the pages was edited in November of 2017. There is no conversation on the topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * No rating is shown. It is not a part of any WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class
 * We have not discussed the topic in class.

Week 4
I intend to add more information on different aspects of Peter Bellwood's life aside from his education. I must do this then by adding sources that back up my claims. This article lacks sources and information.

There is an interview and some general info in the following sources.

Here is the bibliography I intend to use:

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Qtjh3HAAAAAJ&hl=en

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0069282/

http://theojai.net/mcdowell-unchained/

Peter Bellwood

Peter Bellwood

Current Anthropology 2009 50:5, 707-708