User:Michy099/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating? Airlines for America
(Provide a link to the article here.) Airlines for America

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this article because my internships main focus is on Aviation, more specifically women in aviation in the 1900s, so I was hoping to find some kind of information of a women's role in this group. More specifically, the actions made by the group toward women aviators or stewardesses. This group, the Airlines for America most likely aligned themselves with the zeitgeist of the time, meaning as the feminism movement flourished, the group most likely had a reaction or acknowledgment of the movement, implying the women's impact in airline society.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introductory sentence does provide enough information for the reader to understand what the article entails, like using the words "represents" and "since 1936" to emphasize that it is still in action. The lead does briefly line out what the article will entail, beginning with brief explanations to all sections before ending, but does not explicitly say what information will be provided. The article is extensive enough to understand what Airlines for America is, and offers just enough information of its mission, who is head of the group, and its relationship with the United States. The article does provide an image of an advertisement the Airline for America published, allowing the reader to understand the importance of the organization is to commercial airfare.

The article is Rated a C, and is a part of several Wikiprojects, such as Aviation, Business, Organizations, and United States. The Talk page is incredibly interesting as it mentions the authors original struggles to change their one sided perceptive, as most of their information came from mainly one source, and struggled to incorporate critiques provided by other Wikipedians. Therefore, the article can improve in providing more information on its impact on United States airfare in a societal lens. ~