User:MickMick24/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Charlotte Bolland
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this artical to have a better undersatnding of woman in Art History, by focusing on one particular person.y

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * It has an introduction but thats about it. Nothing on her life or what she is curently doing.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * I sapose so? Like stated before this article could use some major work!
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It gets stright to the point.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, talks only of Dr. Bolland's carreer.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Under the "select puplications" the last dated information was entered as 2019. However, the sources say 2020. Maybe this is just a new Hstorian?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Yes! I want to learn more about ths womans life,begning career, end of career and if she is still a curent Art Historian.
 * I think its important to have everything that is currently in the aritical, I just want somthing more that could potentialy help me out as a future Art Historian by following in her footsteps. But, I won't know till I have the information.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * No, its bland and has no flavor.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, only facts or what seem to be like facts.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, just very little information.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, the only thing its giving me is facts. Who she worked for and what she worked on.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * They seem to be. One is an nterview with Dr. Bolland. My question is why s it lacking so much information.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, 2020.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, but not very heavy articals. Also, she is young looking so it could have somthng to do with it.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * In a sense yes, but I'm done readng in two seconds. Articals should make you wonder and think in the content.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Does not seem to be any.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, I also enjoy the braking down of her acomplishments.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * No Images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * No conversation. It sounds like this articals was thrown togeather for just one desperate college student.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Stub class
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * I'm not sure. I guess we have just talked more on text and the amount of it in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * It is still being edited and curently read. The talk page shows the last edt to be Feb. 13, 2020.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * Gets stright her career and has only facts.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * MORE CONTENT
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * Very poorly developed. This could be a great artical with a lot of work and research.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:Talk:Charlotte Bolland