User:Midnightc721/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

We chose this article because we wanted to do more research on a subspecies of salmonella. This matters because salmonella is actually a quite common thing to catch within people. Also, we picked this article based on the relevance to our class course.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The leading section could use a little bit more work and information provided as it seems short. The sources and references for this article is good. Everything is correctly cited and listed at the end of the article. The organization is good and it flows from each topic. There is only one image and it is cited and it appealing for people to visualize what it looks like. The talk page is limited to only a little bit of information and questions. I think the article overall could use some more information on the topic to clarify some things.