User:Mig713/Mendez v. Westminster/HIGZILLA Peer Review

General info
Mig713/Mendez v. Westminster
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Mig713/Mendez v. Westminster - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Editing User:Mig713/Mendez v. Westminster - Wikipedia
 * Editing User:Mig713/Mendez v. Westminster - Wikipedia
 * Editing User:Mig713/Mendez v. Westminster - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article looks strong and complete however I do not see what was added or removed from the article. As a result, it is hard to understand why this article needs to be improved on. I would suggest working on narrowing it down to what exactly you are trying to fix on the article that way we as audience can why you choose this article to work. A good place to start would be your edits on the article involving attorney David Marcus and his argument and how it goes against the 14th amendment and how children would testify during the trial based on their own experiences of discrimination and racism. By focusing on Marcus, the reader can gain a new understanding as to why the Mendez fought against Westminister School District with their valid argument for opposing the school districts policy.