User:Miguel6514/Evaluate an Article

Situationism (Psychology)
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Situationism (psychology)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.- I chose this article because i am already familiar and comfortable with this topic

Lead

 * Guiding questions

Yes, the lead includes an intro sentence that explains exactly what you are going to be reading. The article is short but does state the major sections. No the lead does not include info that is not present in the article. The lead is concise it is not overly detailed.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

Yes, the article speaks on Socialism psychology. Yes, the article content is up to date of this year. No content is out of place


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

The article states what situationism psychology is. There are no claims that are biased toward situationism psychology. No, the article does state experiments about the topic. No all the article does is inform you of valid information on situationism psychology


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

Yes all facts are backed up by reliable sources. Yes the sources are thorough and come from outside sources. Yes the sources are current. The links do work


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

Yes the article is well written and organized into labeled sections. No grammatical errors that i saw. Very well organized


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

There are no images but in my opinion for this topic images are not needed.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

A lot of information on information psychology is given throughout the article. Wikipedia breaks the information down from sources while in class the information is coming from the text.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

I believe this article is top notch this is why i chose it. Articles strengths are very organized sections and layout. The article could be improved by adding a tiny bit more information to the text. This article is very well completed and organized.


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: