User:MiguelG2022/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Fiat money
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I wanted to see what a quality wikipedia article looks like.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it is clear and easy to understand.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it provides a overview.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, it does not.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The article gets to the point and does not have irrelevant information.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the article's content directly connects back to the topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, the content has been recently updated and reviewed.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is no missing content or content that does not belong.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? The article maintain a neutral tone.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are not biases to a certain position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Nope.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it is neutral.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is well written.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, grammar is correct.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is well organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? It has proper images.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are criticism about the heading.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is rated highly.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Nope.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Great
 * What are the article's strengths? Concise and easy to understand
 * How can the article be improved? There is some additional content that could be added.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well-developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: