User:MiguelM27432/Choose an Article

Option 1

 * Fish Factory
 * The article is short yet informative and gives images that help inform the audience of the processes that takes place in the facilities. However the article is a single paragraph and can be separated into different sections and be expanded on. Not all links included in the reference section seem directly related to the topic of fish factories; more informative sources could help improve the quality of the article.
 * https://www.globalseafood.org/blog/seafood-processing-plant/
 * https://www.fao.org/flw-in-fish-value-chains/value-chain/flw-in-fish-value-chainsvalue-chainprocessing-storage/processing-plants/es/
 * https://www-sciencedirect-com.jpllnet.sfsu.edu/science/article/pii/S0964830513001194
 * https://www.fao.org/flw-in-fish-value-chains/value-chain/flw-in-fish-value-chainsvalue-chainprocessing-storage/processing-plants/es/
 * https://www-sciencedirect-com.jpllnet.sfsu.edu/science/article/pii/S0964830513001194

Option 2

 * Medicine Lake (Alberta):
 * The article is very detailed but lacks clarity, there seem to be minor grammatical issues. The existing sections make finding specific information simple but they are not equally developed. The lead feels under developed, adding information and editing for clarity would help give a better introduction to the article. The geology section does a good job describing the structure of the lake but lacks information about the minerals and rocks present, adding this information would help complete the section. The article could use a more neutral tone (ex: remove opinionated phrases like "fisherman's paradise" or "surprisingly abundant") and more sources to help raise the credibility of the article. :
 * http://parkscanadahistory.com/wildlife/report-10.pdf
 * https://www.canmorekananaskis.com/jasper-national-park/jasper-national-park-medicine-lake-and-rose-maries-rock.html
 * http://parkscanadahistory.com/publications/jasper/maligne.pdf:

Option 3

 * Generic brand:
 * The lead is informative but a visual of a generic brand product would help readers identify the distinguishing features of generic goods. Most of the information is placed in the characteristic section but separating the information into more sections (ex: consumer perceptions and history) would improve the clarity of the article. Additional sources that explore consumer concerns such as "health and safety" would help improve the credibility of the articles claims. Over all, this article requires further development and organization. :
 * https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/9804
 * https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22475494/
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/2081641653?parentSessionId=tLm1XsvamCj1AgLtRGh%2BV0YJtG0VKu5dtLtNky7EaMA%3D&pq-origsite=primo&accountid=13802

Option 4

 * Rice cereal:
 * The article is very short and requires further development. The lead focuses on baby food when referring to rice cereal but not all rice cereal is marketed as baby food. In addition the article relies on a single source for all its information, the resource for the article mentions controversy about rice products being fed to children but the wikipedia article fails to mention the controversy and health concerns. The source used for the nutrition table provided is looked, its' accuracy is questionable.:
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4847023/
 * https://www.fda.gov/food/chemical-metals-natural-toxins-pesticides-guidance-documents-regulations/supporting-document-action-level-inorganic-arsenic-rice-cereals-infants
 * https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/fda-warns-parents-about-arsenic-in-rice-cereal-201604059473:

Option 5

 * Toner (skin care):
 * The lead is very informative and the bullet points improve the clarity. The "Types of Toners" section and sub headings make information easy to find but something that could help improve the quality of the article would be to add a dermatologist opinion section. Including research about the effectiveness of toners in a skin care routine and dermatologist recommendations as far as active ingredients in relation to skin types would help the reader feel more knowledgeable after reading.
 * https://www.forbes.com/sites/nomanazish/2021/03/31/do-you-really-need-a-face-toner-heres-what-the-derms-say/?sh=21e7ee68446f
 * https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/are-facial-toners-necessary-0
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/fashion/toner-often-met-with-a-shrug-is-having-its-moment-skin-deep.html:
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/fashion/toner-often-met-with-a-shrug-is-having-its-moment-skin-deep.html: