User:Mikamek1/1995 strikes in France/Russell76 Peer Review

General info
Mikamek1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mikamek1/1995_strikes_in_France?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1995 strikes in France:

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article that I'm reviewing the sandbox for doesn't have a complete draft within the sandbox, but rather a summary of the article and a review of it. I think that the summary that was written summarizes the article well, and just from reading the summary that was within the sandbox I felt like I understood the core reason behind the strikes. I'm assuming that the fact that it is a summary is just a mistake, and if I judge the article as a whole and assume that this student made some slight changes to it, the article is satisfactory. The lead and content of the article were both complete, and the lead accurately gave a summary of what the article is about, while the content went further in depth about things surrounding the event. All of the information that is stated is backed up by a source, and the links that I tested worked and were accurately represented on Wikipedia, which adds reliability and integrity to the article. The one criticism I would have is a lack of pictures, as I think that it would help the reader visualize the strikes. In conclusion, I think this article is in a good place, and while there are certain things that could be done to improve it, it still accurately conveys information about the strikes via reliable sources.