User:Mike1901/Permissionsqueries

Answered


 * 2016082910005478 24/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016083010020565 24/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:57, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016083010019077 24/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016083110001066 24/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016090110033096 25/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016090110033998 25/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:55, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016090910016395 26/11/2016
 * Mostly good, but ping me on IRC about this one when you see me. ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Discussed. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016090910024493 26/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016090910038451 26/11/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016101410009274 18/12/2016
 * ~ Rob 13 Talk 00:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Query
 * 2016090910020451 Hi - with this one, would you grant it straight off? The licence is in the name of someone CC'd to the ticket and everything else checks out (including the photographer's email address in the CC). I'd be inclined to I think (as the photographer would have objected to us by now if all wasn't OK) but as it's a scenario we didnt cover, I'd like to check first. Thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 09:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a reasonable interpretation, yes. Alternatively, you could email the photographer yourself and ask for a quick confirmation. It's a judgement call. ~ Rob 13 Talk 16:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I know for next time! (Someone's processed a duplicate ticket I missed of this already which I've now merged - incidentally they agree with us too!) Mike1901 (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)