User:Mikimotole12/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Is everything in the article relevant to the article to the topic?

-For the animal rescue and rehabilitation program paragraph, it did not tell the public about how some times they rescue the animal and not release it back into the wild. But to keep them and place them in meaning less shows.

Is there anything that distracted you?

- Yes, the selection under killer whales, it says tat SeaWorld's main attraction is its killer whales, several of which are housed in 5.8 million gallon tanks ( which is the size of a 9 Olympic sized swimming pools), which I know from reading different articles that they are not that size in real life. they are much smaller concrete pools which these orcas are depressed in.

Is the article neutral?

- This article is just really talking about SeaWorld and what it does. Like the article is kinda more leaning of the positive side instead of the neutral side. Talking about the good it has done and that's mostly it for the good side. The rest of the article is talking about the locations and the history about it.

Are the viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented?

- some viewpoints of the Blackfish film section, it tells us that SeaWorld disputes the accuracy of the film but that is underrepresented because there is clear points in the film that state the truth of it. It overrepresented it self when they were planning to build new killer whale tanks that would be almost double the size of the existing ones provided more space for its whales, well wouldn't they have built tanks that were big enough in the first place. saying there were meaning their company wanted to show they care more and make the conditions better for the animals.

Do the citation links work?

- The links do work and do tell the information that was provided. Like the history of how it all started, the Blackfish Film, the killing of several people by a killer whale, the locations of where the SeaWorld's are located all around the country and the one that is going to open in Abu Dhabi but it was abandoned amist the international financial crisis, animal recue and rehabilitation program, and response to drive hunt capture allegations.

Is each fact referenced with appropriate, reliable reference?

-Well sorta like the article doesn't really tell about everything that happens

Any information out of date?

- I do not think so because they have the important dates that are listed and the events that happen like the killing of the people that were killed by an orca whale.

What type of conversations?

-The association of zoos and aquariums, habitat or tank, December 2016 layoff news.

How was the article rated?

- c-class

WikiProjects?

- WikiProject California / Southern California (rated c-class, low-importance), WikiProject Florida (rated c-class, low-importance), WikiProject San Diego (rated c-class. mid-importance), WikiProject United States/ Texas/ San Antonio task force (rated c-class, low-importance), WikiProject zoo (rated c-class), WikiProject Amusement Parks/ SeaWorld entertainment (rated c-class, high importance)

How was Wikipedia discusses this topic