User:Milan Rosen/Chemical weapon/BrendanMagee Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Milan Rosen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Milan Rosen/Chemical weapon - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chemical weapon - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Yes, Milan’s content is directly related to the article. The edits they have created are labeled with existing sections that they will be added to.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

I believe that Milan’s edits are neutral, the inclusion of the details regarding the Allies’ disposal as well as more diverse groups help to keep the discussion neutral and relevant to the course content. I think the variety of topics Milan has addressed will be well-suited to the neutrality of the sections they are intended to be added to.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I think that in order to expand the viewpoints discussed in this edit, Milan can talk about the effects of chemical weapon disposal on specific environments, and the people experiencing these effects.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Yes, Milan’s links and sources work and are relevant, some of the sources have not been used yet, presumably for future edits.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

Milan’s references are largely peer reviewed, save those which report news.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

The nature of Milan’s content draws from older events and thus a large period of time to draw resources from. I still consider them relevant and recent, but there is a wide range of dates which is probably good.