User:MilesShriv/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Multiplayer video game

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article for a couple reasons. The first and most important being that I have a love and passion for video games. This drove me to this topic and made me feel like it was something I wanted to write about. My first impression was that the authors had already constructed a pretty solid article. This article matters as it is describing the history and detailing the background of one of the most important/fun parts of video gaming, playing with friends and others. I think in the gaming community itself, this is a really important article.

Evaluate the article
My article has a solid leading section with a baseline description of the article in the beginning. The article features relevant and up to date information that describes the history and nuances of multiplayer video gaming. The article has a neutral tone and does not seem to be biased in any way. However, it is clear that the people who took the time to write this article are video game enjoyers, so that may count as a bias. From what I saw, all of the facts in the article are backed up by relevant and reliable sources and the article is organized and well written. The article only features one image, and while the picture does enhance the article, I think it could benefit from having more. A lot of the discussions are talking about relevance and or what to include in the further expansion of the article. It does not seem to be a part of a talk page. I think overall, my article is in good standing. I think it would benefit from a little more specification in some parts of the writing and more images as well. Some of the strengths are that the article is detailed and well written. It is clear that the article is well developed.