User:Miligirl808/Chromis verater/J76hawaii Peer Review

Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

J76hawaii


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Miligirl808/Chromis verater


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chromis verater

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I was impressed with the structure and how much information they have added on from the original article. Also, with the information on how Hawaii reef fishes does not have that much gene flow. Thank you for complementing the information I provided about my species.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) The article mainly discusses the species. There is one part that it mentions the Oval Chromis, which I think they can take out. I'll make sure to take out the Oval chromis section.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Yes, the subtitles for each section is appropriate.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? I believe she has the correct information under each section.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes, her writing style and language is appropriate and easy to understand. Full of information without being biased. Thank you.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? I noticed that there was no text linked to the reference list. No numbers within the Wikipedia article. I still need to figure out how to put the little numbers in my text and references.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? There is a reference list at the bottom of the article.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? They are not however linked with a little number. I need to figure out how to do this.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? The quality of the sources looks pretty good and reliable.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? A change I suggest they could do is add in links to certain words and create links to the reference list after information. It could help readers find out where you are getting the information from. Also, I think you could take out the part where you mention the Oval Chromis. I will try and fix what you mentioned.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I think right now it is not reader for prime-time on Wikipedia. They just need to improve on adding on the links to words and citations then it could be ready.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The most important thing the author can improve on is the links to the reference list and links to words in the article. Sounds good.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I notice in their article that they described that their fish likes to be in a low light environment. I could also describe what kind of environment my fish likes to be in. They were very thorough with their information and I need to do the same.