User:Millersamanth/Antisocial personality disorder/SarahAlbertson4500 Peer Review

Peer review due 2/28
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Millersamanth NStoinski
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Millersamanth/sandbox

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes


 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I have a couple of suggestions to look into below, but you've already made some excellent changes and I am very impressed by the work you've put into this so far!

Content evaluation
''The content you added relevant and gives the article a lot more depth. It also looked like your added content was up-to-date and matched a lot of what we discussed in class.''

''I noticed you mentioned you'd like to research more on age with antisocial personality disorder. One of the DSM criteria is that you must be over 18 to be diagnosed, which is partially just to make sure the disorder is persistent instead of a developmental phase earlier in life. This might be something to add to the "Signs and Symptoms" portion of the article.''

''Relating to talking about age - A lot of people with ASPD display symptoms before that and are diagnosed with Conduct Disorder, which it looks like the article briefly mentions. Maybe this might be something to look into more and add on to? I actually have this study I used when I took Abnormal Psych which shows the percentage of those that displayed Conduct Disorder in youth, then Antisocial Personality Disorder later on in life.'' https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1941

In the "Epidemiology" section, if there's data on the overall prevalence of ASPD in the population, and a male to female ratio on who is diagnosed, I think that would strengthen this section even more than you already have!

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
You did a very good job adding content that is neutral, professional, and objective.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
You have a good handful of great and up to date sources.

''The only part that really stuck out to me was your second paragraph in the "Prognosis" section - I wonder if there are sources that back up what you state in the third and fourth sentences. Since we talked about this in class, maybe the textbook outlines this more?''

Also don't forget to cite your sources in the second paragraph of the "Prognosis" section!

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I noticed!
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
''The article is very well organized and easy to follow! There were two minor organizational things that catch me off guard. First was wanting to add age to the "Epidemiology" section, since it might fit under the "Signs and Symptoms" section.''

Overall Impression
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Discussed below
 * How can the content added be improved? Discussed throughout peer review article

Overall evaluation
''Overall, you have a really great article with a lot of great information! It's very informative, well organized, and you're adding a lot of valuable content (with good sources) that greatly improves the quality of the article. All that I found to be added or improved is listed above in each individual "evaluation" section. You're doing an excellent job, and keep up the good work!''

Completed review SarahAlbertson4500 (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)