User:Min-Fan1/Traditional Chinese marriage/Yc19990311 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)Min-Fan1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Min-Fan1/Traditional Chinese marriage

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?YES
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?YES
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?YES
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?concise

Lead evaluation
The lead is really good and clear. The introductory sentence is concise and clearly describes the article topic and the lead brief description the article's major sections.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?YES
 * Is the content added up-to-date?YES
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?NO
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?YES

Content evaluation
The content is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. Well done.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?YES
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?NO
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?NO
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?NO

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added is neutral, it is just introduce the traditional Chinese marriage.And the viewpoints is not over presented.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? YES
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?YES
 * Are the sources current?YES
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?YES
 * Check a few links. Do they work?YES

Sources and references evaluation
All the links and sources is reliable, all the content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.And all the sources are current.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?YES
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?NO
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?YES

Organization evaluation
the content is well-written and is easy to read, There are no any grammatical or spelling errors. and well organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?NO
 * Are images well-captioned?NO
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?NO
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?NO

Images and media evaluation
I do not find any images in pages, I suggest you can add some relevant images in your pages.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?YES
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?YES
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?YES
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?NO

New Article Evaluation
The article is well-organized.Well done

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? YES
 * What are the strengths of the content added?GOOD
 * How can the content added be improved?YES

Overall evaluation
Overall, your pages is well-organized and clear. It is easy to read and understand what you want to present. The structure is good and I suggest you can add some images to make is better.