User:Mindbodypedia/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Suzanne O'Sullivan

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it was one of the chosen articles by the teacher for the Wikipedia work. The article is very limited in terms of content, the organization is also lacking.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section

The lead section is the entire article. It is composed of several lines that do not make a fluid paragraph. This section could have easily been broken down into content sections.

Content

As said earlier, all the content is shoved into the lead section. It can be better organized and categorized. Content is also lacking.

Tone and Balance

The article is written factually, thus the balance of tone is present.

Sources and References

Three of the link do not lead where they are supposed to. Since it is an article about a living person, most references come from news and one radio show.

Organization and writing quality

No organization is present, although it is short and concise.

Images and Media

No media is present.

Talk page discussion

There is only one comment. Either the commenter misunderstood or the author fixed the issue noted, there was no reply.

Overall impressions

The article is greatly unfinished. It might be limiting writing about a living person, but at least the article can be organized. Maybe some details can be added about her bibliography.