User:Minhhang1406/Peer review

Types of Peer Review
There are different types of peer review, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Often, the chosen peer review model changes based on the content of the journals and the publisher. According to Taylor & Francis Publishing, these are the most common types of peer review:


 * Single Anonymous Peer Review: In this model, the reviewers know the authors' identity, but the author does not know the identity of the reviewers. It is mostly used when reviewing scientific and medical journals, and permits the reviewer total transparency as they will remain anonymous.
 * Double Anonymous Peer Review: In this model, neither the reviewers nor the author knows each other’s identity, meaning there is total anonymity. It is common in humanities and social science journals and eliminates any risk of bias.
 * Open Peer Review: In this model, both the author and the reviewers’ identities are known. This method allows readers to see more detail of the review process.
 * Post Publication Peer Review : In this model, the paper is first published online and then an opportunity is given for reviewers and readers to give their feedback. This process allows for a wider range of perspectives and quicker publication.
 * Registered Reports: This process splits the review into two parts and allows the author to get feedback on the question they want to answer and the experiment they are using to test it. This method emphasizes the importance of the research question and the methodology used for conducting research (Taylor & Francis, 2021). It is best employed for scientific journals.