User:Minhokorea/Mirocaris/Srobinson55 Peer Review

Intro:
This section has a fairly solid intro sentence. However, I think you really go into content in the second half. Maybe try to have it begin as more of an introduction sentence that does not give solid content. Additionally, I think the "Respiration Rate" subtitle is a bit superfluous since there is only 1 subsection. Another option is to put the food detection under the adaptations section. I'm not sure what the literature is like, but maybe try to cite a different source for the more general statements, like the last one!

Food Detection:
There is also only one source cited for this section. I would recommend trying to incorporate another one regarding the antennae themselves, or other general statements. The second sentence is a bit awkward, so I would recommend editing the syntax here. Additionally, I'm not the best at grammar, but I believe there are some comma issues in the following sentence. In terms on content, it seems very descriptive and well written! If anything, try to connect more to how this is an adaptation/detection technique.

,

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)