User:Minou0901/Zulu people/Rockstar815984 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Minou0901
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Minou0901/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content added gives more information regarding certain aspects of the article that were lacking previously, as well as new information on different ideas surrounding Zulu people.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? The sources may be from a few years ago, but the information being provided still seems relevant to their culture today.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All of the content provided seems to fit into the realm of Zulu people and their ways of life. More information on the development of their kingdom/population was missing for me, though.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, not really any opinionated statements.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No-- the information is being provided to inform the readers on a certain culture.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Religion and beliefs has a lot of information, but there could be more discussion on modern Zulu population.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? It does not-- the information appears to be presented in a neutral manner.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes-- there are four reliable sources below the draft that guided the research.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes-- they are mostly academic journals or articles from appreciated newspaper companies.
 * Are the sources current? A few are from several years back, but they all less than fifteen/twenty years old.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? They all work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes-- the draft adds more information to lacking areas and introduces new ideas as well.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? New vocabulary, more traditions and clothing styles that give understanding to the Zulu culture.
 * How can the content added be improved? Possibly adding more about the modern population and more general statements on clothing, maybe why exactly they dress the way they do (geographical reasons, traditional/customs)?