User:Mintking96/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
History of communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason why I chose this article: History of communication is because I was usually interested in this following topic. As a Communication Studies major, I am always welcomed with communication related articles and this article caught my mind as it entails specific information within how communication technologies and regarding methods have evolved and changed overtime. The very first thought that came up into my head when I first skimmed through the whole flow of the article is that this article is well neat formatted so that it can provide such comfort and convenience to the readers. No matter how astonishing or useful the information is, I personally believe that readers won't be appreciated at all if the article is not well formatted.

Evaluate the article
Within the Lead Section, as the article: History of communication is more about providing information rather than stating a certain argument, the lead section well describes the overview information about the article and regarding backgrounds. It briefly provides article's major sections and does not provide information that is not present in the article. It seems rather concise than overly detailed lead section. However, it could have been better if there is a one strong thesis sentence that connects the overall information. While it is well structured, I see a central pillar missing here. It can definitely be said that such information included in the article are relevant, up-to-date and well formatted accordingly within the contents table. While it provides useful information of Communication advancement in a historical perspective, it does not deal with any equity gaps. As it mainly entails information that are only facts that has actually happened chronologically, the article does not include any biased information or thoughts. All the sources from the references page seems reliable and solid secondary resources. Those sources are well playing their role as backup supporter that well reflects the article's main information. The overall writings seems clear, professional and well sectionized into each categories. The article also entails various images that helps the readers to better understand within which communication technology was used and prominent at the days referenced. On the Talk Page, this article is rated as Level 4 vital article in history while being graded as Start-class on the quality scale and High-importance on the importance scale. The biggest strength of this article would be its neat format and concise writing that only entails necessary information to support the overall quality of the article. By looking closely into each sections and putting a solid thesis in each parts that might rearrange crucial points and provide another chance for the readers to organize the information they had absorbed so far, the article can be improved.