User:Mirandabaez/sandbox

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Samile Bermannelli:Samile Bermannelli
 * I have chosen this article because there is barley any information provided about Samile's life and career.

Lead
Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

- Yes, the Lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. The article is about model Samile Bermanelli and it introduces her to the reader.

- The article has no major sections and the Lead is the introductory sentence.

- The Lead is a sentence long.

- The Lead is almost too concise.

Lead evaluation (write out your thoughts here)
The Lead is one sentence describing where Samile is from, her date of birth and what her career is. It doesn't highlight any of the major sections of the article because the article is only one section ( a very short section) long.

Content
Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

- The articles content is relevant to the topic

- The last time the article was edited was in 2018 and Samile has still been active in the modeling industry so there should be some updates made.

- There is so much content missing in the article. There is hardly any information regarding Samiles life and the information posted about her modeling career isn't very detailed.

Content evaluation (write out your thoughts here)
This article barely has any content.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

- Yes, the article is neutral

- There are no claims that appear heavily biased being made.

-There are no viewpoints that are that are overrepresented or underrepresented.

- The Article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position.

Sources and References
Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

- Yes the article is backed up by a reliable secondary source

- The sources are thorough

- The sources are current

- All the links are working

Organization
Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

- The article is a stub so there is not much to elaborate on when it comes to organization.

Images and Media
Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

- The article doesn't include any images

Checking the talk page
Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

- The talk page is empty

- The article is rated stub class

Overall impressions
Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

- The articles overall status is stub class

- The articles strength is that everything is cited properly

- The article can be improved by expanding it

- The article is under developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: