User:Mirichops/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Astronomy

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I am particularly interested in astronomy. I found it a very rich article, explaining the different types of astronomy!

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article's lead section is well done: it summarises well the topic, including a mention of the major sections of the article and although it is quite detailed, maybe a bit too much for being a lead section.

The sections presented in the article are numerous and well balanced, and they're up to date and even recently edited, moreover it's all "neutrally" described: it reports facts with no signs of persuasive or biased writing. It is very well-written and organised, and it is rich of information.

Moreover all the work is well cited: over a hundred citations are provided in the "reference" section, even supported by links. This includes citations for the images used in the text, which are credited properly too.

For what concerns the "Talk" page, since Astronomy is such a broad topic, it is full of various discussions and debates, and highlights that the article is extremely well rated, and part of different WikiProjects.