User:Mirmir77/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Folly

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The concept of a folly is interesting in the fact that it is highly subjective, and somewhat controversial. A folly, mainly in the field of architecture, is a building crafted mainly for decoration, however due to its elaborate appearance and presentation, it is thought to be otherwise.I believed the article was very short in length and could have delve deeper in to the nuance of the history and progression of follies in architecture.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article goes into detail about follies and the historical origins they reside. Furthermore, it details the characteristics, main purpose, and many examples from various countries around the world. The content is valid, however more information past 2021 could contribute to its relevancy. The lead section was very well-written, as it clearly defines the sections and main topic of the article, without taking away from the body of the article. The citations, references, and organization of the article is well-structured and is very straightforward. However, the article is short in length and could use more content, such as the artistic or cultural importance of follies in other fields of architecture. In conclusion, the content and organization of the article is high quality, but it is lacking more content and relevancy.