User:Misa900/Ryan Larkin/Zavala02 Peer Review

General info
Misa900
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Misa900/Ryan Larkin:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ryan Larkin:

Evaluate the drafted changes
The edits made to the Ryan Larkin article are very competent, the way in which the sentences are formulated are very concise. The subjects of which are also sensible which would reasonably be in the article in the first place. The sources are also available unlike others which can sometimes be too old that the websites no longer exist or are pay walled. The tone is very professional with little to no personal bias when writing the sentences. I also like that not only is there more context given to one off statements such as his sexuality, but a source is provided to reinforce the claims. Overall I'd say the strength of the article has been improved compared to before.