User:Mishesbone/sandbox

Note: 1.almost all that is used here(but not all);resources,illustrations are verifiable and thus referenced appropriately. 2.All concepts are deduced and No new Knowledge is being claimed but a reasonable coinage the certain verifiable principles. 3.though Some holy scriptures are cited ,its not for religious in citations but chronological purpose driving at extracting the concept in context and not more. Mishesbone (talk) 18:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Bible  Concept of Kinds According to Chronological order: <ref genesis 1:25="God made the wild animals, according to its kinds,the livestock according to their kind"/. The concept of Kind is that of

Form follows function <ref wikipedia="is a principle associated with modernist architecture and industrial design in the 20th century. The principle is that the shape of a building or object should be primarily based upon its intended function or purpose. The American architect, Louis Sullivan coined the phrase, although the authorship of the phrase is often, though wrongly, ascribed to the American sculptor Horatio Greenough,[1] whose thinking to a large extent predates the later functionalist approach to architecture. Greenough's writings were for a long time largely forgotten, and were rediscovered only in the 1930s; in 1947 a selection of his essays was published under the title Form and Function: Remarks on Art by Horatio Greenough. The American architect, Louis Sullivan, Greenough's much younger compatriot, who admired rationalist thinkers like Greenough, Thoreau, Emerson, Whitman and Melville, coined the phrase in his article The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered in 1896 (some fifty years after Greenough's death), though Sullivan later attributed the core idea to Marcus Vitruvius Pollio the Roman architect, engineer and author who first asserted in his book De architectura that a structure must exhibit the three qualities of firmitas, utilitas, venustas – that is, it must be solid, useful, beautiful.[2] Here Sullivan actually said "form ever follows function", but the simpler (and less emphatic) phrase is the one usually remembered. For Sullivan this was distilled wisdom, an aesthetic credo, the single "rule that shall permit of no exception." /> Kind(type)theory

The Theory of Mind-Likeness or Like Mindedness this Postulates that Like Minds Attract where as Unlike Minds Repel. Symbolically -- = Attraction +- = Repulsion ++ = Attraction This is Based On the Inverse of the concept behind the Laws of electrostatics concerning Charges-which states that un-like charges attract where as like charges repel. so that ++ = Repulsion -- = Repulsion -+ = Attraction according to <ref name = www.physicsclassroom.com "there are two types of electrically charged objects - those that contain more protons than electrons and are said to be positively charged and those that contain less protons than electrons and are said to be negatively charged. These two types of electrical charges - positive and negative - are said to be opposite types of charge. And consistent with our fundamental principle of charge interaction, a positively charged object will attract a negatively charged object. Oppositely charged objects will exert an attractive influence upon each other. In contrast to the attractive force between two objects with opposite charges, two objects that are of like charge will repel each other. That is, a positively charged object will exert a repulsive force upon a second positively charged object. This repulsive force will push the two objects apart. Similarly, a negatively charged object will exert a repulsive force upon a second negatively charged object. Objects with like charge repel each other."/> But what Happens In The Case of Humans(minds)? Note that Minds are not physical Phenomena. The Thing about the theory of Mind-likeness is that its not perceived by the Five senses or based on them.Rather it is based on Intuition which is not physical or measured empirically. Two or more Minds with similar interest are more likely to attract compared two Two or More Minds with different interest. Though individual differences are inherent in each individual mind.according to . Plato's observations could be pictured more in physical appearances or traits and not that which is the in mind's convolutions(what goes on in the mind).