User:Miso Raven/Alex Donis/Jloon Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Miso Raven's article on Alex Donis.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft of Alex Donis article.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The current version is the same as the draft that was previously linked.

Lead

 * Yes, the lead includes new content added. It is an introductory sentence describing the type of artist Alex Donis is and what his art is primarily about.
 * The lead somewhat connects to the article's main sections. It does connect to the sections about Donis's works but it does not connect much to the section about his Biography. It may benefit from including a brief mention of Donis's biography in order to bring in that section.
 * Yes, the lead contains information not presented in the article because it mentions specifics about Donis's art which should also be added into later sections.
 * The lead is concise but could be improved by adding a bit more information that connects to the other sections of the article.

Content

 * Yes, all the content added is relevant to Alex Donis's life and his art.
 * The most recent source is from 2015, but that may be as updated as most reputable sources may be for this artist. If there are more sources that have more updated content it may be beneficial to add them.
 * The article could benefit from including more material from the cited sources, especially in regards to his biography. There is a lot of connections to his famous works already though which is good.
 * Yes, this article addresses Wikipedia's equity gaps by brining attention to a member of a historically underrepresented population.

Tone and Balance

 * Yes, the content added is completely neutral.
 * No there are not any biased claims. The only thing that may seem biased is the statement about Donis's work being censored but that is also founded in the sources.
 * I do not see any under or overrepresented viewpoints.
 * No, the content of this article does not persuade the reader to favor one position over another, it simply presents information about Alex Donis and his art work.

Sources and References

 * Most of the content is backed up by the two sources cited. The only thing that is not cited is the information in the lead, but that is any easy fix.
 * Yes, the content does reflect what the cited sources say. I think the sources could be referred to a bit more to give a more rounded look at Alex Donis's background and art.
 * There are only two sources included right now but those two do seem to be very thorough, especially since one of them goes into detail about the behind of Donis's work.
 * The authors of the sources could be more diverse, but seeing as there are only two right now, that may be fixed when more sources are added.
 * One of the sources included is a peer reviewed article which may be the most reputable source out there. I did find this source from this site, which may be a good one to add.
 * The links included on this article all work.

Organization

 * Of the content that is added, it is all concise and easy to read.
 * There are no spelling errors or grammatical errors that I noticed.
 * Yes, the content is organized into three sections: Donis's biography, his notable exhibitions, and his notable works.

New Articles Only Checklist

 * The article does not meet the notability requirements because it only includes two sources and not three, and I believe one of them was written by Alex Donis himself.
 * There are only two sources, so the article would benefit by including a couple more. I believe there are more sources out there that could be used to provide more information.
 * Yes, the article follows the structure of other similar articles and the template provided.
 * The content added has improved the quality of the article because it has given a good overview of Donis as an artist.
 * The content added seems to be the most important information about Donis and his work, and the sources it is pulled from seem to be the most reputable.
 * This article could be improved by adding a couple more sources and adding information that could provide a more well-rounded view of Donis and his art.