User:Misselle23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Disruption (adoption)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) It seemed interesting. I don't know a lot about the adoption or disruption process.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) It seems like the article needs work. Some of the citations seem to be out of date, and they are mostly news articles. I think that the sources should be updated and that peer-reviewed or other scholarly subjects could be used to help enhance the articles credibility. There are no pictures at all within the article. The article lacks important information in the lead section; they do not include the main subjects that are discussed further within the article. The tone of the article seems a bit negative. It does not described the adoption process and it comes off as being 'off'.

Feedback
Good work! Chronophoto (talk) 17:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)