User:MizuAzul/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Psychographics
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes. Relates to market segmentation and behavioral targeting
 * Is it written neutrally? Mostly neutral, but could be written to improve with balance.
 * Does each claim have a citation? Most claims have citations.  Article is short and could use both more information and more citations
 * Are the citations reliable? Most citations seem reliable, however, many are pre-2010.  More recent citations could benefit the article.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? Article does not go into cons of using psychographics and could be expanded to add more balance.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too. There are a number of comments on the talk page.  Looks like the article has received some good initial interaction.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title: Promotional mix
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes. Marketing and advertising
 * Is it written neutrally? No. Article is a brief stub sketch poorly outlined
 * Does each claim have a citation? Some citations but concerns on the talk page that some are irrelevant
 * Are the citations reliable? See above concern from talk page
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too. Talk page has proposals for deleting this Stub and also for merging with another more developed article. Stub is rated of high importance.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources