User:Mj291/Peronia Platei/Asalvio Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mj291


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mj291/Peronia Platei
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * none exists
 * none exists

Evaluate the drafted changes
Good start, your categories are all looking good. The lead section is clear and easy to read. The context of the article is also easy to read and stay neutral and in line with Wikipedia formatting. You don't have your facts in your sentences cited with your sources, it looks like you have 5 sources but you only have one in the proper citation form but next to the fact you're citing. To cite use your source for that sentence and put the citation behind it like this: "Peronia Platei, a common name for the intertidal sea slug. " and then add your list of references at the bottom under references. Other then needing to make you're references properly formatted good job starting from scratch. The format for the rest of the article is correct when it comes to headings and flow of the article. I also recommend to link words that people might not know what it is for further education. like: Gastropod, overall good start just fix references. ''Hello, Asalvio. Thank you for the peer review. I will work on putting in the proper citation form and link to the words such as Gastropod. Thank you very much for the help.''