User:Mjbmicro/Methanoperedens nitroreducens/Mroghair Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Mjbmicro


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mjbmicro/Methanoperedens nitroreducens
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Methanoperedens nitroreducens
 * Methanoperedens nitroreducens

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved, and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions:

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Yes, it seems well written. No distracting extraneous information

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

Seems neutral

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Seems well-represented

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

All links work, and seem to support the claims made

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

The article is well-referenced and has neutral sources

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

Nothing out-of-date, no major missing pieces

Other notes:


 * I really like your name definition to start your article off
 * You could add more Wikipedia hyperlinks within your article if you wished. For example: candidate species, methanotrophic, bioreactor, cocci, anaerobic oxidation of methane, ...
 * You state in the "Morphology" section that the organism has a low growth rate. Do you mean it grows slowly or to low-density concentrations? Has anyone cultivated the organism? Stating specifically that is has/has not been cultivated would be useful, since you call it a candidate species early in the article
 * You say "only two known organisms couple methane oxidation with nitrate reduction" -- who are they? Can you add hyperlinks to their WIkipedia pages?
 * This article is very well written! I think it covers just about everything we probably know about this organism, doesn't skim over or linger on any topic too long, and does a nice job of describing the organisms impact on the environment. Great job!