User:Mjgirard10/Urban agriculture in Barcelona/JULRIL1632 Peer Review

Everything in the article was well-developed and relevant to the article. I enjoyed the setup of the article moving from the history and background of it in Barcelona, then to various techniques and different components worked well. The way that it also moves from bullet points to expand on the more important topics in a lot more depth was a great addition as well.

From my point of view, the article was very neutral. There were facts and information presented, but not biased toward one specific position or take on the topic. It was an overall review. The tone is also neutral and formal.

I think that the viewpoint of focusing on the current Barcelona Climate Plan works well, as the history is not overrepresented in this article, more focusing on the current and future direction of the city's plan.

The citations are all great and working, as well as used well throughout to support the information being presented. Overall, this is a great piece and is well-developed. There is limited critical feedback I have because it hit every major checklist item that one should consider. If I had to make one suggestion it would be to turn the section with bullet points into paragraph style.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)