User:Mjohn55/sandbox

Bibliography/Notes (Sources)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-21/marie-kondo-tidying-up-clutter-bad-for-you/10732968

https://theconversation.com/marie-kondo-a-psychologist-assesses-the-konmari-method-of-tidying-110217

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2015/04/15/dont-just-spring-clean-change-your-life-clean/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ab13b82398ec

https://qz.com/1181019/the-japanese-words-for-space-could-change-your-view-of-the-world/

http://time.com/4270371/in-which-we-explore-the-utterly-perplexing-art-of-decluttering-with-joy/

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/10/magazine/marie-kondo-and-the-ruthless-war-on-stuff.html

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/marie-kondo-couple-dealt-backlash-181500294.html

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/marie-kondo-creates-boom-for-op-shoppers-but-bad-news-for-oceans-20190119-p50scu.html

Article Draft

Synopsis of season one
The premise of "Tidying Up with Marie Kondo" is that each episode, Kondo visits a new American family household in need of organizing and decluttering. Each family has individual backgrounds and needs, which the show addresses with both hands-on guidance from Kondo and cutaways of Kondo giving additional KonMari explanations.

Methodology of the show
Marie Kondo's ideology towards decluttering is called the KonMari method. Her process, which she expands upon personally in the Netflix series, includes having participants go through their homes section by section--"1) Clothing, 2) Books, 3) Paper, 4) Komono (kitchen, bathroom, garage and miscellaneous) 5) Sentimental items". Then, when the items are gathered together, Kondo asks the participants to go through the individual items one by one and only keep what "sparks joy."

While her method to cleaning is effective in organizing people's homes and environments, Kondo came to understand that her method was "far more psychological than it was practical." This perspective is supported well by studies done on how people perform and feel in tidy versus messy environments. Research suggests that "clean organized environments" have a variety of psychologically beneficial effects--such as clearer thought processes, increased confidence, and abilities.

Further research shows that an untidy environment can negatively impact many aspects of human health--such as mood and stress levels, memory capabilities, and even the ability to process other people's facial expressions. When people's personal space is "decluttered," they are better able to sleep, focus, and hold feelings of satisfaction with their lives.

The evidence that Kondo's show positively affects the mental health of the people featured in it isn't just seen on the show itself, but in interviews given by participants later on. One couple, seen in Episode 1, "Tidying with Toddlers," Kevin and Rachel Friend, said after Kondo's help that, "Chaos for us doesn’t happen anymore. We’re able to take on things. Nothing overwhelms us anymore. Now, it's just our lifestyle."

(parts copied from original article are in bold):

Reception
'''Reviews of the show have been generally positive. On the review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, the show holds a score of 78%, noting that Marie Kondo "makes for a delightful instructor". On Metacritic, the show has a score of 69 based on eight critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews". '''

'In The Atlantic'', Sarah Archer says that the show is about "cultivating empathy for the things that surround us", noting that Kondo's empathy is the key to her success in helping people. In Vice, Nicole Clark writes that by showcasing the inner workings of family homes, the show has unintentionally highlighted differing gender expectations towards tidying and organizing households. '''

'Jack Seale in The Guardian'' is less positive, noting that the show is simply "a show where a woman just tells people to tidy up." He adds that the before and after reveals lack excitement, revealing the same house except tidier. '''

Others have been on the fence, like Kristin van Ogtroi from Time, who wrote about the "completely bananas" method Kondo employs, suggesting that while necessary items should still be kept around, it is still a worthwhile endeavor to mentally refocus on what brings one joy.

Effect on donations to charity shops
'''In the immediate wake of the show's release, some charity shops saw an increase in the number of donations received. Donations to Goodwill stores in the Washington D.C. area were up by 66% for the first week of January, an effect attributed to the show encouraging people to tidy their houses. Beacon's Closet in New York also saw similar increases in donations. ''' In western Sydney, charity St Vincent de Paul saw a 38% rise in donations in the first three weeks since the show's premiere.

Article Selection

Options:

-Marie Kondo --The content is relevant, but could use more information. It is written neutrally. Every claim has a citation, and the citations are reliable. One idea for additional information is to research and add more of Kondo's own words and interview responses.

-Tidying Up with Marie Kondo --The content is relevant, but the article is very short and could use more information. One idea for additional information is to include historical references to Marie Kondo's method of tidying, which perhaps can be connected to other philosophical ideas on cleaning. It is written neutrally. Every claim has a citation, and the citations are reliable. CHOSEN ARTICLE

-Comedy Central Presents --The content is relevant, but could use some more information. It is written neutrally, however it seems to need some additional citations, and the only citation used is a press release, which could be seen as a bit unreliable. One idea for additional information is to research and add what the general public response (reception) was to the various shows (either specific comedians or the various versions of the show) that have been created and put on air.

Article Evaluation -- "Online deliberation"

-Everything in the article does seem to be relevant to the article topic; the only thing that distracted me as a reader was that the writing feels very technical and easier to understand if you already have a grasp of the subject. Perhaps there could be some simplifying language used in the beginning of the article for those of us not already knowledgable about it.

-The tone feels neutral, which is great.

-As I'm not familiar with some of the sub-topics of the article, it's hard for me to judge whether it is well balanced or if it is missing some viewpoints. However, it does give "Advantages/Disadvantages" in one of its subtopics, so that seems to add credibility and balance.

-The links in the resources area are working and seem legitimate. There are numerous citations within the article itself, which is a good sign for the facts. However, the "Rating Systems" section does not have any citations.

-The talk page shows the article was heavily edited up until July of 2018, and shows some effort at making the article more accessible and understandable.