User:Mjr499/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Atrium: Heart

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I was looking on the C-Class list, as instructed to on the article evaluation page, and found this.

Evaluate the article
I think the article is a little bit disorganized, I would change the placement of the last sentence of the lead section. I'd probably place it closer to the first sentence where the term "auricle" was first introduced.

The tone of the article is neutral which is good and the content is up to date, although seems unbalanced and oddly organized. I find it odd that there is an explanation for the left atrial appendage but not the right atrial appendage, I think both need to be explained. Also, left atrial appendage has it's own section with only two sentences which seems odd. The structure, function, and development seem to be more in depth than the rest of the sections on the article. I think this is okay because those are important, however, I think a little bit more balance between sections would also be beneficial.

There are a couple of good reference images.

A good amount of references have been added, but the talk page said closer to the original creation of the article there were none. The talk page also brought up including the reason for size differences between atria and I do agree that it would be a beneficial addition.

Overall, I think the article is still being developed and it's current rating on Wiki is C-Class. The function and development sections seem to be the strong points right now. I think with the addition of more information, a little bit of reorganization, and some change to sentence structures, this article will be easier to read and more informative.