User:Mjsalnic/Sex reversal/Decampr Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Mjsalnic
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Mjsalnic/Sex reversal

Lead evaluation
The lead provides good, updated content from the original stub, but remains concise which I like. I think there is room for improvement in a few ways: First, I think there could be more citation throughout, even if it's just the one source. Second, I think starting a lot of sentences with the words "Sex reversal" gets repetitive. Third, it may be good to outline what the body of the article will talk about at the end of the lead (this is more of a Wikipedia suggestion than a me suggestion).

Content evaluation
All the content is obviously relevant and much more informative than the original page. Good mix of pre- and post- 2010 articles. One thing I am wondering (based on your note at the bottom about future additions): what kind of stuff constitutes sex reversal in mammals? Is there specific mention of the phenomenon of sex reversal when it comes to things like pseudopenises/enlarged clitorises in mammals, or is it more like those female lions that grow manes?

Tone and balance evaluation
I think the tone is better than the original article, in that you don't brush sex reversal off as something that is relatively unknown. I don't think there's any biases being imparted in the info itself.

Sources and references evaluation
Lots of sources; definitely a big improvement from the original stub. Like I said earlier, there's a good mix of pre- and post- 2010 research. Links to sources work. Perhaps you can just cite more? Especially in the first lead paragraph.

Organization evaluation
I think the content is easy to read and follows a clear linear sequence. There are a few grammar/punctuation fixes that can be made.

I was going to make a comment about there only being one large heading which, from the looks of the article now, could be deleted and the next largest headings could become the lead section headers. I saw your note at the end though that you want to add more sections so you're good with the headings.

Images and Media evaluation
No media has been added so far so this is N/A

Overall evaluation
I think this overhaul of the sex reversal page is much-needed and I'm glad you're doing it! The intro especially is clear about what constitutes sex reversal and the different conditions that it can occur, and the examples of fishes so far are good. There's some grammar/repetition things that I think can be worked out, and definitely cite more. I'm very interested to see this page develop (and if you need any resources for pseudopenises/enlarged clitorises in mammals I can def help!)