User:Mjsalnic/Sex reversal/Pktka Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) mjsalnic
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Mjsalnic/Sex reversal

Lead evaluation
Really good! Concise but conveys a lot of information and, in my opinion, sets up the reader to expect the organizational structure that follows.

Content evaluation
Yes, it is relevant! The things I would suggest to add, you have already made a note to look for more information on, so this seems like a great partial draft!!

Tone and balance evaluation
This all seems neutral so far. I do not see any claims that appear biased towards any opinion in particular.

Sources and references evaluation
All content is backed up by a reliable secondary source -- lots of journal articles! The information here seems thorough, and there are both older and newer sources. All the links seem to work!

Organization evaluation
Everything is concise, clear, and easy to read, even to a non-expert. The information that is here currently is organized well. I am interested in how the remaining organisms and taxa will be organized.

Grammatical error stuff:


 * first sentence, "is flip" should be is flipped
 * "In aquaculture sex control is important due to is related to reproduction and economic value of the product" doesn't make sense

Overall evaluation
I think the content has definitely improved the overall quality of the article, considering the current version of the article is only two paragraphs. I think that once you look at some other organisms (the ones you mention!) it will be more complete and read a lot more smoothly.