User:Mkarasik/Burmese python/John.waswill Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mkarasik


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mkarasik/Burmese python
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Burmese python

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has not been altered but offers a concise introduction to the article and topic at hand without accurately describes the Burmese Python and the problems it poses, but could include a quick introduction on the large abundance of them in captivity which was the source of the invasive issues.

The content added all was relevant information to the information at hand and all up to date, however, the 3rd link in the citations, the "Photo in the News: Python Bursts After Eating Gator" did not work for me. No content that was added seems to be out of place, and I feel it does meet the equity gaps regarding Wiki as there is a very neutral tone to the article and information added. There is no signs of opiniated responses or unreliable sources and the added information on digestion and the conservation efforts being taken in the native regions comparatively to the efforts being taken in their invasive ranges very much adds to the article, providing new information on the topic. However, the 2nd paragraph of information in the diet section should be incorporated into the invasive species section of the article as it is describing the effect it has on the ecosystem based upon its diet.

The sources are all current and provide reliable information, all but the 3rd citation work for me. The sources came from a variety of places, all which I felt a strong sense of credibility. All new information added has been properly cited and linked within the paragraphs of the article and there was not any images added to the article, maybe add a picture of a python eating an alligator or one that has invaded a home or something like that to show how severity of the problem?

Overall it is a very well written and properly incorporated the new information into the article, with the two things being slightly adding to the introduction about conservation and moving the 2nd paragraph of the diet section to the invasive species part to better suit the information in the section rather than what its diet does to the surrounding ecosystem.