User:Mkatsaro/Evaluate an Article

I chose the wikipedia article on the Robert H. Smith School of Business.

Evaluating Content:

1) Everything that I read was relevant to the topic and nothing was distracting.

2) There doesn't appear to be any out of date information, but the article only has information dating to 2013. I feel like there should be more recent information about the school.

3) I could not identify any notable equity gaps at all. I feel like the article only under represents the recent history of the school, but it includes lots of information from the 20th century.

4) I think that the only major improvement is to add information relating to the more recent history of the school.

Evaluating Tone:

1) The article is neutral as it just provides information and there is nothing involving any type of persuasion.

2) I don't believe that any viewpoints are over or under represented.

Evaluating Sources:

1) The links of the sources do work and the sources do support the information in the article.

2) It seems as most of the facts are referenced with a reliable source. All the sources are neutral with no bias in them.

3) Some of the sources come from the University of Maryland, but there are also many other sources that come from different authors as well.

Checking the Talk Page:

1) In the old discussions from around 2009 there were some people complaining about some bias and complaining about sources coming from the school. People also wanted added information about dual-degree programs.Then there were also many people just stating that they added information to the article.

2) I do not see any rating or that it is part of a WikiProject.

3) We haven't talked about the Business school in class.