User:Mkcharlie32/Tkhine/Actuallyrmk Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Mkcharlie32
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Mkcharlie32/Tkhine

Lead
Guiding questions:

The Lead has been updated to reflect new content, and includes and introductory sentence that clearly and concisely describes the article's topic. However, it doesn't include a description of the major sections of the article. It's very concise and could maybe use some more detail.

Lead evaluation
Good

Content
Guiding questions:

The content added is relevant and up-to-date - given that this is a historical topic, timeliness is slightly less relevant. I feel like there could be more information about the content of the tkhines, or maybe just some more links or elaborations to the Jewish terms mentioned.

Content evaluation
Good

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:

The content added is neutral, and no claims appear heavily biased toward a particular position. There don't seem to be viewpoints that are over or under-represented, and the content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or another.

Tone and balance evaluation
Excellent

Sources and References
Guiding questions:

All new content is backed up by reliable information, and the sources are thorough. The sources are as current as possible - again, since this is a historical topic, this is a little less relevant. The links seem to work.

Sources and references evaluation
Excellent

Organization
Guiding questions:

The content is well-written, clear, and easy to read. There are a few grammar errors: in the "History" section, the phrase "prayer in a language they did not understood" is used, which should be corrected. Also, some things are capitalized that might be capitalized in a Christian context but wouldn't be capitalized in a Jewish context, such as "Rabbis" and "Scripture". The content is well-organized and reflects the major points of the topic.

Organization evaluation
Good

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:

The content added has improved the overall quality of the article - it seems extremely complete from what we have learned about tkhines in class. It provides a lot of important historical context and really clearly shows the progression of how tkhines developed in importance. Grammar and capitalization can be corrected - other than that, it's great!

Overall evaluation
Excellent