User:Mksearcy/Anorexia nervosa/Sfatima 12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Mksearcy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Mksearcy's draft: Anorexia Nervosa


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Anorexia Nervosa

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The content in the edited version is even though relevant, but a little less to be evaluated, considering the original article's length.
 * I went over the lead section of the original article, I would suggest to take a look at the type of sources. Are they primary, secondary, or the information is drew out of some website?
 * After deciding on the types of sources, you can keep the good peer reviewed secondary sources and get rid of the rest.
 * Brainstorm on which information you want to present while editing the article and how will you approach it.
 * Then, from the good sources, decide which information you will keep that is in the original article and what information you want to add from the articles you found other than previously mentioned in the original article.
 * So far, nice job in drawing information out from the article used in "Behavioral symptoms".
 * Repeating what you have already done in your draft with the other content from the original article will help you build you draft.