User:Mktthind13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Brain damage

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because I really think brain damage is a topic that we do not know a lot of things about the brain in general let alone what happens if it is injured and maybe there is a chance to reverse brain injuries in the future. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was very well written and though there was technical jargon it links it to the wiki pages that can help in understanding of those words.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I don't think there was anything in the article that was not directly related to brain injury and this made it easy to follow the article and not feel as if it didn't have proper transitions. There was no bias that I could find and the article had a neutral tone throughout it which makes it a really well written article that has the only job of being informative. The article has various sources from varying publications and authors and from the few links I clicked they all worked. In the talk page I saw the goals various individuals had in not only adding to the article itself but editing it and giving it a better flow. ~