User:Mkurosu808/Centropyge nahackyi/Shiryl82 Peer Review

Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Mkurosu808/Centropyge nahackyi)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Mkurosu808/Centropyge nahackyi - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Centropyge nahackyi - Wikipedia
 * Centropyge nahackyi - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)      This article is well written and structured. It is very well detailed.
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Yes, i liked that it was well written, detailed and easy to understand.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Yes.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? yes
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? yes
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) yes
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? yes
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? yes
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? yes
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? excellent
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? I woudn't change anything i think that this artilce is very well written.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Yes, I feel that this article is ready for the world to see.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? They did an excellent job.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Yes it is a great article for me to use as a reference and do my own wikipedia

Hi Shiryl82,

'''Thank you for your feedback! It is nice to hear that you enjoyed my article, and found it helpful to your own work as well. I wish you the best of luck on your article, and I look forward to seeing the final version.'''

Mahalo,

Mkurosu808