User:Mlee1260/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Pantalone
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I have chosen this article because I am fascinated by the established character archetypes within commedia dell'arte, and this is one of those well-known archetypes.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, it describes who Pantalone is and what his significance is to the art form.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, it has an outline section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is a concise summary of who Pantalone is.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, but there is likely content that could be added.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, but there are a couple instances of "should" statements.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Most are, there are a couple places that a citation could probably be added.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Most are book references, so they have no links (ISBNs could be added?). The few links that are websites do work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * It includes one image of Pantalone.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The only image is captioned with the title of the drawing and the artist.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The most recent question is from 2017 and suggests looking deeper into the history of the character.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * WikiProjects: Theatre, Circus, Fictional characters. Rated start-class.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Not really something we've discussed at length in class yet.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * Unsure if there is a mention of this at all.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It gives a nice overview of the character and what makes it a specific archetype.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * There is more content that could be added to flesh out the article - history, popular culture references, etc.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * Complete, but could use some expansion on topics that go undiscussed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: