User:Mlgantz/Environmentalism in music/SunnyBunny4 Peer Review

General info
Mlgantz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmentalism in music
 * Environmentalism in music

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section is concise with all the prevalent information needed to set up the rest of the article. The content added by my peer is up to date and relevant. The content added is neutral and completely factual as it is sources needed to support the information stated in the article. The content added improved the article overall by supporting the topic of environmentalism in music via the use of relevant, recently produced songs and their authors. While it doesn't necessarily address equity gaps the neutral tone provided by my peer aided in the factual representation of the article. The article already seemed to be quite nicely developed. Nothing that my peer did interrupted that smooth and organized development, yet luckily, it did end up backing up the article with more support. Furthermore the sources she did add back up the information stated in the article really well.