User:Mlong01/sandbox

What is it?
Performance Based Contracting or PBC is a product support strategy utilised by Program Managers (PM) to achieve measurable warfighter selected performance Outcomes for a weapon system or subsystem. A PBC approach focuses on developing strategic supplier relationships, and directly relating contracting payment to performance against a set of performance metrics. In a traditional approach, payment is related to completion of milestones and project deliverables. A PBC utilises performance outcomes such as availability, reliability, maintainability, supportability and total cost of ownership. The primary means of accomplishing this are through incentivised, long-term Performance Based Contracts with specific and measurable levels of operational performance defined by the user and agreed on by contracting parties [1].

Alternative Description - PBC is about buying Performance, not transactional goods and services, through an integrated acquisition and logistics process delivering weapon system capability. PBC is a support strategy that places primary emphasis on optimising weapon system support to meet the needs of the warfighter. PBCs delineate outcome performance goals of weapon systems, ensures that responsibilities are assigned, provides incentives for attaining these goals, and facilitates the overall life-cycle management of system reliability, supportability, and total ownership costs.

A PBC in practice involves a contracting agency (who are contracting the work to an external provider) and a contractor (who are responsible for completing the work set out in the contract). Several other parties are often involved, including subcontractors, a legal team and consultants. These parties work for both contracting agency and contractor completing various elements of work associated with contract development, contracted work completion or performance management / measurement.

PBC is the name used in Australia, New Zealand and Canada to describe the practice of attaching contract payment to a set of performance metrics. It is commonly known as Performance-Based Logistics in the USA and Contracting for Availability or Contractor Logistics Support in the UK. Although it was developed in the USA for Defence application, and is most actively applied there, PBC strategies are growing in popularity around the world and in industry sectors other than defence. In particular, PBC frameworks are becoming popular in Shipping, Transport, Health Services and the energy sector.

PBC is also known as:
 * Performance-based logistics
 * Performance-based life-cycle product support
 * Contracting for Availability
 * Contractor Logistics Support
 * Contracting for Capability
 * Power-By-The-Hour

What are the benefits?
There is some debate about the efficacy of PBC as a product support measure. However there is significant research to suggest that PBC can reduce costs and result in better outcomes than traditional contracting approaches. An American study into the effectiveness of PBC frameworks in Defence projects was recently conducted. The study found that projects employing a true PBC framework resulted in substantially lower costs and improved system readiness / capability when compared to non-PBC arrangements [2]. In addition to this, a study by Booz Allen Hamilton found that even incorporating a small amount of a PBC framework into weapons system support will create positive outcomes [3].

In a more general sense, implementing a PBC framework has a broad range of benefits for organisations, contractors and contracting agencies, including:
 * Improved contracting outcomes
 * Reduction in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
 * Ability to accurately forecast cost within contract bounds
 * Improved accountability for performance
 * Development of a clear understanding of performance requirements
 * Promotion of strategic benefits for Contracting Agency and Contractor
 * Integration of all contracting aspects in a single set of performance measures
 * A 'Fair' contract outcome
 * A greater understanding of life-cycle costs

Defence
PBC is widely applied in the Australian Defence Sector, primarily by the major acquisition and support organisation, the Defence Material Organisation (DMO). It is particularly useful in the Defence environment because of the inherent complexity and large scale of the projects. Recently, Australian Defence has initiated an escalation of the use of PBCs with the strategic aims of improving capability outcomes and reducing total cost of ownership [12]. In Australia and the USA, PBC frameworks are most commonly applied in Defence situations.

PBC frameworks are currently being used in numerous Defence related projects, including, but not limited to:
 * BAE Hawk Lead-In Fighter [4]
 * Royal Air Force (RAF) Eurofighter (5)
 * Royal Australian Navy (RAN) ANZAC Class Frigates [6)
 * Australian Army Armoured Vehicles (7)
 * Royal Australian Navy (RAN) COLLINS Class Submarines (10)

However, as indicated above, PBC is growing in popularity in other sectors outside of defence.

Other Industry Use
Although it is applied primarily in the Defence environment, PBC is becoming more popular in a broader range of private and public sector organisations as they seek to reduce costs and create a closer link between expenditure and project outcomes.

Areas outside Defence where PBC is applied include:
 * Commercial Shipping
 * Public Transport
 * Health Services
 * Energy Generation
 * Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO)
 * Commercial Airlines
 * Manufacturing

Some examples:
 * PBC for Australian Road Maintenance [9]. This case study provides insight into road maintenance contracts conducted in Western Australia and New South Wales. In both instances, very positive outcomes are recorded. Another case study related to Performance Based Contracting in Road Maintenance claims that in 2005, 35 countries were employing PBC for Road Maintenance, and in 2006 15 others had implemented a PBC or were investigating its use [11].

Methodologies
The best way to express a methodology for developing a PBC is through a simple process. However simple the process may look, the practice of making this happen is very difficult.

The methodology included in the cited presentation provides a good example of a logical process for establishing a PBC framework [8].

The process is as follows:


 * 1) Business Case - a document which reviews potential risks, benefits and other potential impacts of a PBC, usually presented to senior managers to aid in their decision making
 * 2) Outcomes - a short statement reflecting the desired result or final deliverable of the contract
 * 3) Measures - define a set of performance measures that collectively measure the organisations performance against the outcome statement
 * 4) Levels - set performance levels for the performance measures, i.e. how well the contractor needs to perform
 * 5) Payment - develop a set of payment curves which set out the pay for performance regime i.e. how much the contractor gets paid for their performance level
 * 6) Incentives - set out a group of incentives that encourage positive behaviours and discourage negative behaviours
 * 7) Contract - draft, review, workshop and finalise a contract which covers all aspects of the performance, payment and terms and conditions of the relationship
 * 8) Review - conduct an analysis of the outcomes of the PBC, taking into account the differing definitions of success from the different groups involved in the contract.

Useful Links

 * Aerospace Systems Division PBC Handbook
 * Australian Department of Defence - ASDEFCON PBC Template
 * Defence Material Organisation (DMO) - Contracting
 * Research @ Wharton - Power by the Hour